Impact of dermatology eConsults on access to care and skin cancer screening in underserved populations: A model for teledermatology services in community health centers

Published:October 20, 2017DOI:


      The clinical outcome of teledermatology with dermoscopy in large-scale primary care networks remains unclear.


      We evaluate the impact of implementing a teledermatology consultation program with dermoscopy on a statewide scale, focusing on access to care and skin cancer screening for medically underserved populations.


      Descriptive retrospective cohort study of 2385 dermatology referrals from primary care from June 2014 through November 2015.


      Before implementation of electronic consultations (eConsults), access to dermatology was limited; only 139 (11%) of 1258 referrals resulted in a confirmed appointment with a median wait time of 77 days. Post implementation, 499 of 1127 consults (44%) were sent electronically, and of those, 16% required a face-to-face visit with a median wait time of 28 days. Ten malignancies were identified via eConsults. Overall consult volume remained stable pre- and post-eConsult implementation.


      We evaluated eConsults in medically underserved populations seeking care at community health centers. Results might not be generalizable to other populations or in other settings.


      eConsults increase access to dermatologic care and reduce wait times for patients receiving medical care at community health centers. Implementing dermoscopy into teledermatology could increase access to skin cancer screening and treatment for medically disadvantaged populations.

      Key words

      Abbreviations used:

      CHCI (Community Health Center Inc), eConsult (electronic consultation), EHR (electronic health record), F2F (face-to-face), PCP (primary care provider)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      AAD Member Login
      AAD Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Johnson M.-T.
        Defining the burden of skin disease in the United States - a historical perspective.
        J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004; 9: 108-110
        • Hay R.J.
        • Johns N.E.
        • Williams H.C.
        • et al.
        The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2014; 134: 1527-1534
        • Resneck Jr., J.
        • Pletcher M.J.
        • Lozano N.
        Medicare, Medicaid, and access to dermatologists: the effect of patient insurance on appointment access and wait times.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50: 85-92
        • Center for Connected Health Policy
        Tele-dermatology in Medi-Cal. Findings from the field and challenges for the future.
        2011 (Available at)
        • Kimball A.B.
        • Resneck Jr., J.S.
        The US dermatology workforce: a specialty remains in shortage.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008; 59: 741-745
        • Vimalananda V.G.
        • Gupte G.
        • Seraj S.M.
        • et al.
        Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2015; 21: 323-330
        • Nelson C.A.
        • Takeshita J.
        • Wanat K.A.
        • et al.
        Impact of store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology on outpatient dermatologic care: a prospective study in an underserved urban primary care setting.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 74: 484-490
        • Uscher-Pines L.
        • Malsberger R.
        • Burgette L.
        • Mulcahy A.
        • Mehrotra A.
        Effect of teledermatology on access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees.
        JAMA Dermatol. 2016; 152: 905-911
        • Coates S.J.
        • Kvedar J.
        • Granstein R.D.
        Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part I: history, rationale, and current practice.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 563-574
        • Whited J.D.
        Med Clin North Am. 2015; 99: 1365-1379
        • Branch W.T.
        • Collins M.
        • Wintroub B.U.
        Dermatologic practice: implications for a primary care residency curriculum.
        Acad Med. 1983; 58: 136-142
        • Alghothani L.
        • Jacks S.K.
        • Vander Horst A.
        • Zirwas M.J.
        Disparities in access to dermatologic care according to insurance type.
        Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148: 956-957
        • Resneck Jr., J.S.
        • Isenstein A.
        • Kimball A.B.
        Few Medicaid and uninsured patients are accessing dermatologists.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 55: 1084-1088
        • Cronin P.R.
        • DeCoste L.
        • Kimball A.B.
        A multivariate analysis of dermatology missed appointment predictors.
        JAMA Dermatol. 2013; 149: 1435-1437
        • Moustafa F.A.
        • Ramsey L.
        • Huang K.E.
        • Huang W.W.
        Factors associated with missed dermatology appointments.
        Cutis. 2015; 96: E20-E23
        • Kheirkhah P.
        • Feng Q.
        • Travis L.M.
        • Tavakoli-Tabasi S.
        • Sharafkhaneh A.
        Prevalence, predictors and economic consequences of no-shows.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16
        • Leavitt E.R.
        • Kessler S.
        • Pun S.
        • et al.
        Teledermatology as a tool to improve access to care for medically underserved populations: a retrospective descriptive study.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 75: 1259-1261
        • Carter Z.A.
        • Goldman S.
        • Anderson K.
        • et al.
        Creation of an internal teledermatology store-and-forward system in an existing electronic health record: a pilot study in a safety-net public health and hospital system.
        JAMA Dermatol. 2017; 153: 644-650
        • Van Der Heijden J.P.
        • De Keizer N.F.
        • Bos J.D.
        • Spuls P.I.
        • Witkamp L.
        Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioners in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower cost.
        Br J Dermatol. 2011; 165: 1058-1065
        • Whited J.D.
        • Hall R.P.
        • Foy M.E.
        • et al.
        Teledermatology's impact on time to intervention among referrals to a dermatology consult service.
        Telemed J E Health. 2002; 8: 313-321
        • Landow S.M.
        • Mateus A.
        • Korgavkar K.
        • Nightingale D.
        • Weinstock M.A.
        Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 71: 570-576
        • Bowns I.R.
        • Collins K.
        • Walters S.J.
        • McDonagh A.J.
        Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial.
        Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10 (ix-xi, 1-39): iii-iv
        • Loane M.A.
        • Bloomer S.E.
        • Corbett R.
        • et al.
        A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study.
        Br J Dermatol. 2000; 143: 1241-1247
        • DuMontier C.
        • Rindfleisch K.
        • Pruszynski J.
        • Frey J.J.
        A multi-method intervention to reduce no-shows in an urban residency clinic.
        Fam Med. 2013; 45: 634-641
        • Moreno-Ramirez D.
        • Ferrandiz L.
        • Nieto-Garcia A.
        • et al.
        Store-and-forward teledermatology in skin cancer triage: experience and evaluation of 2009 teleconsultations.
        Arch Dermatol. 2007; 143: 479-484
        • Shapiro M.
        • James W.D.
        • Kessler R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of skin biopsy triage decisions in 49 patients with pigmented lesions and skin neoplasms: store-and-forward teledermatology vs face-to-face dermatology.
        Arch Dermatol. 2004; 140: 525-528
        • Mahendran R.
        • Goodfield M.J.D.
        • Sheehan-Dare R.A.
        An evaluation of the role of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in skin cancer diagnosis and management.
        Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005; 30: 209-214
        • Hsiao J.L.
        • Oh D.H.
        The impact of store-and-forward teledermatology on skin cancer diagnosis and treatment.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008; 59: 260-267
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Skin cancer rates by race and ethnicity.
        2015 (Available at)